
 | Kolb, D. and Fry, R. 1975, "Toward an Applied Theory of Experiential Learning", in C. Cooper (ed.) Theory of Group Processes, John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York. |
This chapter presents and explains the model of the experiential learning cycle.
If you are interested in reflection in action and reflection on action then you can start with this article by Schön. This article defines and explains the two concepts and at just 10 pages it will provide you with a useful introduction to reflective teaching. If the article interests you, then you might try the suggested book (below).
 | Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
Donald Schön examines five professions - engineering, architecture, management, psychotherapy and town planning - to show how professions really go about solving problems. Although this book was published in the 1980's it is still quoted extensively in the teaching and learning literature.
This is an excellent web page that provides a clear summary of the place of experience and reflection in the experiential learning cycle.
This chapter distinguishes among the concepts and practices of scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching. It focuses on the ongoing cycle that begins with the scholarly process and can lead to improved teaching practice, scholarly publications, and presentations.
This paper provides evidence of the relationship between the scholarship of teaching and learning and students’ course experiences and demonstrates the effectiveness of institutional strategies to encourage the scholarship of teaching and learning.

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Boyer proposed an expanded definition of “scholarship” based on four functions of academics: discovery (discipline research), integration (making connections across the disciplines), application (applying knowledge to consequential problems), and teaching (educating and enticing future scholars). He argued that, within this framework, all forms of scholarship should be recognized and rewarded, and that this would lead to more personalized and flexible criteria for gaining tenure. Boyer considered teaching as a central element of scholarship but failed to define the scholarship of teaching. This failure has led to an inordinate amount of literature that attempts to define the concept.
This article focuses on a model of the scholarship of teaching that speci®cally includes students and it is argued that representing the scholarship of teaching as a re¯ective and informed act engaging students and teachers in learning is supportive of the aims central to the project of developing a scholarship of teaching.
University and Faculty Resources